Non Implant Missing Tooth Replacement Options
Dental implants are an excellent tooth-replacement option which are quickly gaining popularity. This article will discuss how bridges and dentures compare to dental implants in addition to the advantages and disadvantages associated with each solution.
Traditional dentures sit on top of the gums. While the initial cost for dentures is somewhat low, dentures often last for about 7-15 years before they must be replaced or repaired. Dentures can also be uncomfortable, limit a patientâs diet, result in sores, and slip out of place. They also need to be removed daily for cleaning. Because the jawbone is not stimulated, the bone can begin to resorb and deteriorate. This can negatively impact the patientâs facial structure.
Low cost and quick turnaround for treatment Restore the appearance of missing teeth Can be modified and adjusted
Traditional Removable Denture
No stimulation of the jaw bone results in bone loss Dietary limitations Removal each day to clean Dentures are secured with an adhesive
A tooth-supported fixed bridge is the most common treatment after dental implants when a patient is missing one tooth. Tooth-supported fixed bridges require some removal of the healthy supporting teeth. These teeth need to be ground down in preparation for supporting and attaching the bridge. This bridge does not stimulate the jawbone, and can allow for bone resorption. Most bridges fail after 5-10 years from decay as they are quite challenging to clean.
Advantages
Affordable solution Maintained like the natural teeth with brushing and flossing Function similar to the natural teeth Procedure takes a few weeks to complete
More expensive than traditional dentures Removal of healthy tooth structure Risk for decay and infection Difficult to clean Jaw bone is not stimulated
Disadvantages
Removable partial dentures do not require removal of the adjacent teeth. However, this solution is not as stabile or comfortable as dental implants. Dentures can limit what the patient can eat and negatively impacting their ability to speak. This solution is affordable, but lacks the ability to appear and function like the natural teeth. Because the jawbone is not stimulated, it can begin to resorb and change the patientâs facial structure.
Cheaper than implants or fixed bridges Can be adjusted and modified Procedure is quick and non-invasive
Bridge
Unstable and uncomfortable Limited function and do not appear like natural teeth Removal daily for cleaning Adjustments required frequently Easily break and frequently lost
When a patient is missing one of their front teeth, this solution is
